r3ap3r's BLOG

loser

Nope - those are all very good sugestions - but I fear that there are too few active players left - certainally on 1939 server - if they disabled the multi-accounts I reckon there would be only a few hundred active players - many of those only logging on every few days - the game devs would look silly in the MMO league tables - though their reluctance to do anything about it is killing the game anyway - I wwon't spend another penny (and I have spent 100,000's pennies to date - so they know I am good for it) on this game until they kick off at least the clear multi accounters!

My solution would be to limit the size of an army to the total volume of grain produced. Grain could be looted and used for building (like feeding the builders etc.), and that would take this away from being a game dominated by bullies - and inject some strategy into it - but your suggestions are equally valid... Its just a shame that this gamne is dying and the devs have clearly spent some considerable time on it - so I am unsure why they are allowing it to die lkike it is?

fight to win let the babys cry EVERY game has a game over :-)

The grain cap is a good idea, but its not going to gain the devs money.

TW also gains the devs money and gets us all fighting and spending gold, so theyre not going to cap either....

I dont see why there are alliances within the 2 real alliances - Axis or Allied the only other alliances allowed should be country alliances as the countries in WW2 stuck together apart from countrymen no-one trusted anyone 100% - apart from their Axis or Allied alliance winning every country had their own adgenda and ideas. If the sub alliances were dropped there would be more attacks as players wouldn't have their allies to support them, and enemies wouldnt be detered in attacking and so more battles and more gold spent which is good for business.

There should also be a second market for countries or small independants to hire help or arms as it was in WW2.

Look at GB contribution in 8 years of fighting in all 4 corners of the world for all countries,, but it still took them 50 years to pay back the debts... even in those desperate days everyone paid their way and got nothing for nothing. whether we like it or not capitolism drives just about everything - Do away with all alliances apart from Axis or Allied and bid for help on a second market. this would be great fun. and a poker table added to gamble resources, gold, items, cos when people lose they will spend gold and attack which generates more money. simples :)

Potentially a nice solution - but I disagree with your premise:

1. By limiting your army to what grain you can produce you immediately take away the bullies with 'silly armies' - I am not paying for this game anymore when someone (and there are more than one) who has driven countless dozens to this game can defeat anything I build - I could spend $10,000 in the 1939 server and still not be able to defeat one of the bigger NOW players! If there was some strategy again - I would spend - so they are losing money now - as I am not spending - and I am not alone. So they have to figure that they are getting more from cash other players by leavunbg things as they are - like I spent over $1,000 in a few months on this game (because I could afford it!), and maybe they have lost another $1,000 from me alone because there is no cap...

In addition - but reducing an army to what you can produce you would have to rely on the 10% items from the mall mjore - increasing your strength and decreasing the attackrs - all require gold - and cash to use them!!!

Also - how do you monitor just two alliances - who is the leader? Who kicks someone out if they turn 5th column and attack their own? Where do you kick them out too? Who monitors and mentors their alliance members? I run a tiny alliance - and I use the word 'run' loosly as I havn't really been around these past few months except for launching the odd attack... But It is really time consuming finding out how people are doing - who does that for 1,000 players?

A cap is as far as I can see - the only way forward - though I would love to be persuaded otherwise?

If your suggestions would have been in place to start with you may not have spent the $1000 in the first place - if 1000 people spend $1000 devs are millionares, the $1000 bird in the hand is worth the 2 $1000 in the bush. Devs would rather you spend $1000 then realise it could be better and give them ideas how to extract another $1000 from you.

The 2 alliance system wouldnt have a leader.

its like the members who dont have sub alliances dont have leaders everyones countries would be out for themselves like in WW2 regardles of the common objective - if you needed help then your fellow countrymen could advise or hire help from the 2nd market.

The strategy of the game is not to spend all your resources on dev points. if you built a big army at a low rank this higher ranked players would not be able to destroy your troops and when you got to a few thousand R3 you could rank up and take on nOW members in 39 - having many grain farms to keep army fed is the strategy you need not spending $1000s on gold.

I'm just second lieutenant with 64 k dev point.

urm... who from NOW which is 'stronger ' could wipe me off.

quite bored.

Dev points and rank win you almost nothing in this game, in fact they can be a hinderence...

its about troops in relation to your rank that counts, you can be the strongest at any particular rank - you have to be strong enough to deter attacks at each rank...

Sounds like you need to rank up B81 and take on some stronger players :)

agree fully with your proposals.

very profoundly true and all 4 points you give are reasonable and more fair then it is now the case on the 4 servers.

like this,tribal wars are designed only to help the big clans getting bigger...with very little chance to kick them off their throne,the game becomes meaningless cause if there is no way of winning for others whats the point to play?

so please admins,listen to r3ap3r and fix this ASAP...

thanks if you do so!

to hell if you do nothing and remain passive to all thats bein said on forum.

Neo

Es cierto

Buen Post Reaper

La verdad es que los que se unen a estas alianzas que van de primero solo es por estar con el privilegio de los bonos nada mas.

La verdad para mi son una manadas de cochones, y PERDEDORES, pues no les cuesta nada.

La verdad cualquiera puede hacerlo no necesitan de un GRAN CEREBRO . .

pd. a los NOW oIo