Movie

Sign In | Sign Up

My Profile

j_speedy_m
21181
.....
Points: 28
RSS Add Friend

Shortcuts

Categories

Post

BitComet vs uTorrent
Size: Large, Medium, Small Thu Sep 25, 08 04:13 AM | Category: All
35

4 a while, i was usin' uTorrent as my downloader, and that's entirely peer based downloadin', so some of the files can be stupidly slow. u rarely ever see n e thing passed 150 kB/s.

 

now i'm stuck on BitComet 'cause it's amazing. files download fast compared 2 uTorrent, i love lookin' @ the icon that's ever present on the screen near top left when the down speed says 300 kB/s. 'course that doesn't happen all the time, but hell, it's better than almost always seein' 50 kB/s with huge torrents that have no 1 2 seed off of.

 

downloadin' right now, a file that's 4 gig with no seeds at all, even possible 1's, and the down speed is readin' mostly 170 kB/s. goes 2 show how much better BitComet is.


torrent_competition BitComet utorrent
Link: http://blog.bitcomet.com/post/67996/ ©
Add to favorites | Quote Reads (25879) | Comments (67)

CommentsReload

↑
KD79 Thu Oct 2, 08 05:28 PM

Believe me, I love to seed. It's just not easy for us people who live in a country like belgium, where you're fucking restricted with uploads (and downloads). I, for example pay every month €65 for my connection, and with 4 to 6 movies, or some tv-shows, I always exceed my volume. It sucks big time!


↑
Amaterasuomikami (Amaterasu) Thu Oct 2, 08 10:45 PM

you guys need to wiki the word Torrent. it's all the same shit. your clients options, providers specifications, and most importantly your own computer's set-up is what matters for downloading/uploading speeds. maybe look into port forwarding , listening and recieving packets in wiki too i you feel your advanced in torrenting...

otherwise, everything most of you are saying sound like you don't know how your getting this digital information we currently call a torrent.

the sun Feeds all
↑
Mortan Fri Oct 3, 08 11:34 AM

Same here, mate:

- Any other torrent client: < 150Kb/s. 1 Gb in 4 hours.

- BitComet: > 300Kb/s. 4 Gb in 1 hour.

The only thing I'd like BitComet to have is separate tasks for BT and HTTP tasks, so if I have a tas limit of 2 for BT tasks, I don't have to stop waiting BT tasks and increase the limit to download HTTP ones.

Head in the clouds. Feet on the ground.
↑
PHEONIXRETRNS Fri Oct 3, 08 04:20 PM

YA OF COURSE ITS FAR ADVANCED THAN OTHERS.. BUT I DONT KNOW IF MORE SCORE IS OF ANY ADVANTAGE....


↑
lukedotv Sat Oct 4, 08 09:48 AM

my internet is bt and i got upto 500k/s with this compared to a max of 5k/s with u torrent and every other torrent , so i think this works pretty damn well..


↑
kapalee2 Sun Oct 5, 08 12:07 PM

I totally disagree with this post. View my blog for more details

Knowledge must be free!
↑
quicktimes Sun Oct 5, 08 08:59 PM

uTorrent isnt bad, its small sized and less complicated looking, speed isnt for me though, im pretty much BitComet all the way


↑
StCLod23 Wed Oct 8, 08 06:50 AM

Dowloading for me is slow. please advice

thanks


↑
abood_jarrar (abood) Sun Oct 12, 08 07:25 PM

uTorrent is the best believe it or not

Be Palestinian or Die Trying
↑
The_UnUsual_Suspect Mon Oct 13, 08 12:06 PM

uTorrent is a very efficient torrent client, but that is all that it does.

When downloading only from bittorrent sources, two identical computer/connections would perform equally with bitcomet or utorrent. BitComet would out perform if the files were also available from ftp/http or ed2k sources, or from LTseeds.

So basically, both are good clients, uTorrent being a good choice for someone wanting only to run torrents using as little resources as possible, and someone wanting a client with much more abilities would do better with BitComet.

I use both, and have been BitComet's forum Administrator for years.

Admin BitComet Support Forum New Multi-Lingual Support forum http://cometforums.com

TOP