what?'s BLOG

Youre right...

Every time I get atacked, i lose at least 70% of my troops, and the atacker dont lose anything...

And i have all R3 aircrafts, thats nonsense...

My post above was so long ago - I don't even remember it! Oh how green I was back in the day... But I have since figured it out... The strength (R1 or R4) is only part of the equation... I havn't figured out the maths totally yet, but it appears that for every 1 point you give your commander following an attack/task, your commanders strength/speed whatever increases by about 2.5%. Obviously if you can add aids/secretary etc. to your commander then so much the better... So a commander with 15 Charm does a journey in say 12 hours, then it works out about 8 to 9 hours with 32 Charm and 6 to 7 hours with 64... Now if you can get your commander upto 100 in everything right now, you will be invincible against anything on the map even with a load of R2 forces!!! Lots of higher ranked people already know this, but v. few have been prepared to share!!!

So, DO THOSE TASKS!!!!

i agree, i lost 25 anti aircraft, 20 anti tank, and 30 bunkers, 200 r2 rangers and all my planes vs like 30 planes, i already complained, its total BS, and i had defense booster and base defense booster, total BS this def needs to be addressed

REALLY? U THINK ITS RIGHT ON? THEN WHY SO MANY PEOPLE COMPLAIN?

to b exact a rk 3 unit is 2.5 times better than a rk 2 unit.. dun believe? take d calculator and do d maths yrself..

furthermore in my opinion d damage is equally distributed amongst all units of d same type.. dats y weaker units with lower hps and defence r likely to b killed first.. i.e. a grp of trucks with armour escorts d former will be removed first.. look thru d report u shud c dat consistently d weaker units get killed first

dis oso translates into victories of an overwhelming sort.. i personally felt aggrieved too when my massed rk 2 units were obilterated by rk 3 units without a single kill.. thinking back its not at all puzzling given their much higher hps..

for pple who still do not get wat im driving at imagine dis.. u deal say 2000 armour damage which shud b sufficient to take out at least 1 rk 3 armour unit rite since their hp avergages 900?? but dis is not true because not all d damage is falling to a single unit.. dis means dat against a sufficiently large enough force dis damage gets so spread out dat none of d incoming troops r killed.. in other words if u dun deal a aggregate damage large enough to take out at least 1 unit, u wunt at all.. this translates into d many one sided victories defending players hav withnessed.. a guide is then to compare d total no. of units of a type against dat of d enemy taking into acct force ratio considerations i.e. making adjustments for differing ranks.. if u hav a smaller sized type of unit say 8 armour units against 10 of same rks, it is rather a sure bet u wunt even kill a single enemy unit coz d damage gets too spread out amongst d enemy

yea dat was a mouthful but no doubt you got my pt heez.. felt compelled to clear up d mystery of dis non existent attack or defend bug.. my words were d crystalliztion of experiencing multiple catastrophic defeats by stronger players.. hope it helps to clear up any lingering doubts if any